Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 2, 1975No. Docket Nos. 2190-73, 2191-73Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

EMORY A. RITTENHOUSE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

THEODORE H. FEINMAN AND JEANNE K. FEINMAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Rittenhouse v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 2190-73, 2191-73.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1975-347; 1975 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 26; 34 T.C.M. (CCH) 1507; T.C.M. (RIA) 750347;

December 2, 1975, Filed

Charles E. McKissock, for the petitioners.

David W. Otto, for the respondent.

SCOTT

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

SCOTT, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in the Federal income tax of Emory A. Rittenhouse in the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Whipple v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. GeneresSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API