Legal Opinion

Independent Bridge Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1935No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an action of assumpsit by a third party against the surety on a construction contract bond which was conditioned among other things that the principal should pay certain claims of third parties. On or about April 15, 1925, the Independent Bridge Company contracted witli or employed the H. B. Mish Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, as a subcontractor to provide materials and to construct the substructure and bridge approaches of a highway bridge known as the Inter-county Bridge over the Monongahela Biver near Masontown, joining Payette and Greene Counties.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Concrete Products Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Independent Bridge Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia School District v. B. A. Shrages Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. ex rel. Reedy v. American Surety Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API