Legal Opinion

General State Authority v. Coleman Cable & Wire Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1976No. 1234 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The instant action in assumpsit was commenced by the General State Authority, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (GSA), against four named defendants: Coleman Cable & Wire Company (Coleman); Cokain Electrical Service, Inc. (Cokain); Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland (Fidelity); and McCormick, Taylor & Associates, Inc. (Taylor), and stems from the installation into Polk State Hospital of allegedly defective cable. The cable had been manufactured by Coleman, wholesaled by Warehouse Electrical Supply, *387Ine. (Warehouse) to Cokain, who installed same in the hospital…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Alan H. Brader v. Allegheny General Hospital George J. Magovern, and Daniel L. DiamondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Koken v. SteinbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Robert Allen Brown and Lola v. Brown v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  5. Borrell v. Bloomsburg UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API