Legal Opinion

Van Der Vlugt v. Scarborough

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 3, 1982No. 809, September Term, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, J.

The Circuit Court for Montgomery County granted appellee Donna Helen Scarborough’s motion to quash an attachment on her wages. Appellee was alleged to have been one of a number of guarantors of a corporate obligation to Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. Borg-Warner sued all eight guarantors, 1 (six of whom were married couples), simultaneously moving for summary judgment. Appellee answered (separately from Mr. Scarborough) and filed an affidavit swearing that she had neither signed, nor authorized, the signing of the guarantee.

In the absence of transcripts of proceedings we have looked to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Diener Enterprises, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Tedrow v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Starfish Condominium Ass'n v. Yorkridge Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Huston v. DittoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Houghton v. County Comm'rs of Kent Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Ward Development Co. v. IngraoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Houghton v. County Comm'rs of Kent Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API