Legal Opinion

Jezierny v. Biggins

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1976No. 6083PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This action for divorce was initiated by the plaintiff (husband) in the family court, without counsel, alleging that the marriage is irretrievably broken. The defendant (wife) is named in the complaint by her maiden name. Defendant, without counsel, filed a written appearance and consent to hearing without her presence, and the matter came on for hearing before the family court with only the plaintiff present. The record does not disclose precisely what happened at this hearing, but the minutes state: “An Amended Complaint and Appearance and Waiver with respect to said Complaint will be filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Naki v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. DawsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Familian Northwest, Inc. v. Central Pacific Boiler & Piping, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Sturkie v. HanHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. TBS Pacific, Inc. v. TamuraHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. JohnstonHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wylly v. First Hawaiian BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API