Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Phoenix Insurance Company v. Ritchie

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1970No. 12864; 12865; 12870; 12872; 12873; 12874; 12875; 12871Published

1DissentCalhoun, Judge

Respectfully, I dissent. I would deny the relief sought in each of these mandamus proceedings on the ground that eminent domain is not a proper procedure by which the landowners in these cases may obtain a recovery of damages from the state road commission.

In my judgment, the Court in these cases, for the first time, is requiring the state road commissioner, (or the state commissioner of highways), to institute eminent domain proceedings in order to permit recovery for damages which have not been caused purposely or designedly and which, at most therefore, were caused negligently to property…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Perdue v. SJ Groves and Sons CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Buckhannon & Northern Railroad v. Great Scott Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Whitney v. Ralph Myers Contracting CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API