Moxham Investment Corp. v. Thomas-Kinzey Lumber Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
These appeals are from judgments in favor of the plaintiff, Moxham Investment Corporation, in two actions of replevin, tried together in the court below. The same and only the same question is involved in each appeal. It is whether, under all the evidence, Thomas-Kinzey Lumber Company, one of the defendants (a landlord acting through its bailiff, John Woodchuck, the other defendant), could legally seize as a distress for arrears of rent certain automobiles in which plaintiff claimed ownership and Immediate and exclusive right of possession.
Mitrey G. George was an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Derbyshire Bros. v. McManamySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Chestnut v. HarbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Smyers v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Walsh v. Philadelphia BourseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Pickering v. BreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boyle v. Coleraine Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Reeves v. Bowlby, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1962