Legal Opinion

United States v. Pasquale Pagano

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1955No. 23549_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

This case involves another one of those cumulative sentences which we have so often criticized, but which we have no power to reverse in the absence of a finding of error in the conduct of the trial. United States v. Chiarella, 2 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 903, 911. Count IV of the indictment charges appellant, one Mauro and others with conspiracy, during the period from June 1 through June 23, 1954, to offer a bribe and to bribe an Internal Revenue employee; Count II charges appellant with the substantive offense of offering a bribe on June 22, 1954; and Count III charges…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. ChiarellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Amendola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Gondolfo Miranti, United States of America v. Domenico BandoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Eugene CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. KravitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. James LoweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API