Legal Opinion
Emery Soos v. Mehmet Oz
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 7, 2026No. 1:26-cv-01310Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * EMERY SOOS, * Plaintiff, * v. * Civil No. 26-1310-BAH MEHMET OZ, * Defendant. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Emery Soos (“Plaintiff” or “Soos”) filed the above-captioned complaint, ECF 1, and amended complaint, ECF 5, pro se together with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF 2, which shall be granted. Section 1915(e)(2)(B) of 28 U.S.C. requires this Court to conduct an initial screening of this complaint and dismissal of any complaint that (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.