Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jenkins v. Weis

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 7, 1994No. 920652-CAPublished

1DissentBench, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would reverse the trial court’s denial of Jenkins’s motion for a new trial on the defamation claim because the evidence does not establish the truthfulness of the defamatory statements. I would also reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy because Jenkins had no notice and opportunity to be heard on the court’s sua sponte action. In view of these crucial errors, I would reverse and remand the case for further proceedings.

Truth of Defamatory Statements

Jenkins challenged the jury’s verdict…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Wolston v. Reader's Digest Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API