Legal Opinion

Roy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1958No. 30100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODLEY, Judge.

*308The offense is passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, two years.

Appellant, represented by counsel, waived a jury and pleaded guilty, and on the trial after the state had offered evidence sufficient to warrant her conviction, testified and admitted her guilt.

The requirements of the statute relating to trials of non-capital felony cases before the court on a plea of guilty were fully complied with.

The sole complaint appears to be that the trial judge did not see fit to grant probation.

The state correctly contends that this was a matter which rested solely in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Escobar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Redd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. B. R. Sheffield v. Ernest Brooks, Sheriff of Hill County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Quiroga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. M-DBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API