Legal Opinion
Koorn v. Lacey Township
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 17, 2003No. 03-1231UnpublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Shain and Rafaela Koorn brought a seventeen-count complaint against Lacey Township and various Township officials and departments, 1 alleging the Township’s enactment of an animal control ordinance violates their constitutional and statutory civil rights because it was motivated by racial animus. The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted the Township’s motion for summary judgment on all claims, though its written decision focused primarily on the Koorns’ substantive due process claim. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
Facts
Shain…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Behar v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Corwin v. B'NAI B'RITH SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSING CITIZEN HOUSING, INC.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- VINEYARD INV., LLC v. City of Madison, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2010
- Gach v. BoroughDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- LIVINGSTONE v. HADDON POINT MANAGER, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.