Myers v. Holshouser
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
We are confronted, at the outset, with a determination of the scope of the investigatory powers of the North Carolina Board of Alcoholic. Control: may the Board, even if it has no probable cause, require petitioner to produce relevant business books and records without abridging his constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment? We conclude that it may.
The Twenty-First Amendment to the United States Constitution grants to the states the right “to legislate concerning intoxicants brought from without the state for use of sale therein, unfettered by the commerce clause.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Computer Technology Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Myers v. HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975