State v. Wise
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 A jury found Eric D. Wise guilty of second degree burglary and first degree theft. He argues that the trial court violated his federal and state constitutional right to an open trial, as well as the public’s state right to an open trial, when it conducted portions of voir dire in the trial judge’s chambers without first conducting a Bone-Club1 analysis. Because Wise waived any objection to the questioning of jurors who asked to be questioned privately in the judge’s chambers and because Wise lacks standing to assert the public’s right to an open trial, we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 Wise was charged…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WiseWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SublettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Detention of TicesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. LeyerleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.