Legal Opinion

Albreast v. Heaton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 30, 1964No. 3 Div. 55PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a declaratory action by complainant-appellant in which he seeks to be recognized as the only true and lawful ■owner in fee simple of certain real property in Conecuh County where his suit, in equity, was filed.

From an adverse decree holding that he is a tenant in common with respondents— some of whom filed a cross-bill to have the subject lands sold for division of the proceeds among the joint tenants in common— and ordering a sale of the lands for division as prayed, declaratory petitioner appeals.

The sole factual and legal question presented for determination on this appeal is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Davenport v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
  3. Schemerhorn v. VanderheydenNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  4. Ohmer v. BoyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Potter & Son v. GracieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Roddam v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. McLemore v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. In Re the Estate of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McLemore v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API