Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Doyle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1949No. 8828Published

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:

On December 1, 1943, Ray Barker, an attorney of Kansas City, Missouri, and Thomas James Doyle, of the same place, signed a written contract whereby Barker was engaged to act as Doyle’s attorney in matters arising from fraud practiced upon Doyle whereby he was induced to assign his one-third interest in the estate of Edward F. Doyle, deceased, to Ben Doyle.

Barker’s fee was to be an amount equal to one-half of any amount recovered. He was to be reimbursed for all expenses.

Barker associated himself with C. N. Cottingham, a Montana attorney, and they commenced an action in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Betor v. ChevalierMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API