Legal Opinion

Greenwich Savings Bank v. 105 East 24th Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 1941Published

1Per curiam

The first cause of action does not sufficiently allege the specific acts which were negligently done. (Gerdes v. Reynolds, 281 N. Y. 180, 184; Turner v. Craney, 254 App. Div. 919; Newell v. Woodward, 241 id. 786; Beatty v. MeCutcheon, 200 id. 869; Pagnillo v. Mach Paving & Construction Co., 142 id. 491.)

The order should be modified by granting the motion in so far as to dismiss the first cause of action, and denying the motion in other respects, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from service of order to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Turner v. CraneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API