Myers v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Court. — Hon. W. B. Green, J udge. Action for damages resulted iu judgment against defendant, from which it appeals.'
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
i. Actionstihesnby substi' tutioii. This action was first begun by William Myers, who claimed damages for loss of consortium as the result of the alleged wrongful acts of defendant’s employees causing the death of his wife. A demurrer to the petition having been sustained (see Seney v. Railway, 125 Iowa, 290), an amended and substituted petition was filed by F. K. Myers, as administrator of the decedent, claiming damages to her estate. Defendant moved that this be stricken for that it changed parties plaintiff and alleged a new cause of action. This motion is overruled and exception is taken…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bailey v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Clendenin v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Fleming v. Town of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Wood v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Tuttle v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Knight v. Moline, East Moline & Watertown Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Gardner v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Estate of Dyer Ex Rel. Lirot v. KrugSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Pearson v. AnthonySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Lane v. SteinigerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.