Legal Opinion

Robertson v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1898No. 8241PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the district court of' Douglas county. Heard below before Dueeie, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNon val, J.

The object of this action is to perpetually restrain the city of Omaha from levying a special assessment or special tax upon the premises described in the petition to pay the costs of repaving Leavenworth street in said city, between Sixteenth street and Twenty-ninth avenue. From a decree for the city plaintiffs appeal.

It is disclosed by the record that there was'duly created in said city street improvement or paving district No. 447, including Leavenworth street, and the property abutting thereon on each side to the distance of 182 feet, between Sixteenth street and Twenty-ninth avenue, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Brown v. JenksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Hall v. MaherNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Schenectady v. Trustees of Union CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. City of Schenectady v. Trustees of Union CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Diver v. Keokuk Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Wheeler v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Fuchs v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Shake v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kriss v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API