Legal Opinion

Cary v. Thomas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 18, Calendar 46,639Published

1Opinion of the Court

345 Mich. 616 (1956)

76 N.W.2d 817

CARY

v.

THOMAS.

Docket No. 18, Calendar No. 46,639.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 14, 1956.

Rosenburg, Painter & Davidson and Dudley & Rogers, for plaintiff.

Kleinstiver & Anderson and Alexander, Cholette, Buchanan, Perkins & Conklin (Edward D. Wells, of counsel), for defendant.

SHARPE, J.

This is an action instituted by James R. Cary, administrator of the estate of Charles F. Burk, deceased, to recover damages for the wrongful death of Charles F. Burk. Defendant Thomas and wife were the owners of a home on McCain road near the city of Jackson, Michigan. Some…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gillett v. Michigan United Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Inglis v. Millersburg Driving Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Baker v. DelanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Patt v. DilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API