Department of Transportation v. King
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentEllington, Presiding Judge
I believe that the trial court correctly determined that, although Shenita King’s ante litem notice did not specify in dollars the amount of the loss claimed, the statement in her ante litem notice that she would claim “the full amount of damages allowed by law” was *108sufficient to make the Department aware that she was seeking $1 million, in view of of OCGA § 50-21-29 (b) (1), which caps the amount of damages for a claim under the Georgia Tort Claims Act at $1 million. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
Although strict compliance with the Act’s ante litem notice requirements is necessary, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Cummings v. Georgia Department of Juvenile JusticeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. MyersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Perdue v. Athens Technical CollegeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Driscoll v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.