In re the Arbitration between Linne & Stuyvesant Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The record discloses that the written contract was extended and continued in force until a new salary arrangement was made in May, 1941. There was no proof to show any cancelation or release óf petitioner’s right to profits, if any, earned up to that date. Therefore, petitioner was entitled to arbitration for the purpose of ascertaining his share of the profits, if any, from July 25, 1940, to May, 1941. The judgment appealed from should be modified accordingly.
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Lane & Leather Workers' Union of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948