Vineyard Brands, Inc. v. Oak Knoll Cellar
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
This case arose after defendant Rutherford Hill Winery terminated its marketing contract with plaintiff Vineyard Brands, Inc. Plaintiff brought suit, claiming breach of contract and, in the alternative, that the contract had been terminated without reasonable notice. Defendant counterclaimed, seeking, among other things, amounts owed by plaintiff on account. The case was tried before a jury, which brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $98,792 and, on the counterclaim, in favor of defendant for $132,716.03 plus interest in the amount of $54,481.22. Plaintiff appeals the ensuing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sarah Sims Garrett v. City of Hamtramck, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Southwest Concrete Products v. Gosh Construction Corp.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Lemnah v. American Breeders Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Arthur W. Niedland and Margaret W. Niedland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Stanford v. OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carmichael v. Adirondack Bottled Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Carpenter v. Central Vermont Medical CenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Haverly v. Kaytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Foti Fuels, Inc. and Robert A. Foti v. Kurrle Corporation, Payjack, LLC and James J. KurrleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.