Haynes v. Kingstown Properties, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Rochene Terrie Haynes sued Kingstown Properties, Inc. (“Kingstown”) for injuries he allegedly sustained in a fire at a Kingstown apartment complex in Savannah. The trial court granted Kingstown’s motion for summary judgment, and Haynes appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.1 On appeal, we review the grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the evidence and all inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.2
Vi…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovins v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Lonard v. Cooper & Sugrue Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Harris v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Hohnerlein v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Villareal v. TGM Eagle's Pointe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phillip Aldredge v. Timothy B. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- James A. Bennett v. Angela McPhatterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- Stelter v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007