Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1985No. CR 84-202Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

I disagree with the majority opinion because it overlooks the fact that appellant was tried and convicted in municipal court on a misdemeanor third degree battery charge, a lesser included offense of first degree battery. Certainly the municipal court did not have jurisdiction to try a felony case. It did have authority to conduct the preliminary hearing. Arkansas Stat. Ann. § 43-603 states:

Where the arrest is made in the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed, the magistrate before whom the defendant is carried, shall forthwith proceed to an examination of the charge;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Decker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Lampkin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. McArthur v. Circuit CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. State v. CheekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API