Legal Opinion
Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 31, 2002No. 6:00-cv-06596PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
Introduction
In this action, plaintiff Sally J. Burke (hereinafter “plaintiff’) claims that the Kodak Retirement Income Plan (hereinafter “KRIP”) and the Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee (hereinafter “KRIP-CO”) (collectively “defendants”) wrongfully denied her application for pre-retirement survivor income benefits (hereinafter “SIB”), which she claimed when her husband died in November, 1999.
Both plaintiff and defendants now move, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is denied, defendants’…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sally J. Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003