May v. Hurley

*612The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dill, J.

In this case a single writ of error was sued out for the purpose of reviewing three separate judgments that resulted from as many different actions that were tried together by consent. There should, of course, have been three separate writs of error, but this being suggested upon the argument, it was agreed to treat the record as amended to make three writs of error and separate returns.

The one question of importance presented by this review' is whether the master of a vessel, in the absence of special authority, may pledge the owner’s credit…