Legal Opinion

Spence v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 1, 2014No. 2D13-2297Published

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

William Spence was convicted of various offenses but on appeal he challenges only his conviction for driving while his license was permanently revoked, in violation of section 322.341, Florida Statutes (2010). He argues that he is entitled to a new trial on this charge because the trial court failed to give a jury instruction on the necessarily included lesser offense of no valid driver’s license. We agree.

A trial court commits reversible error when it fails to give a jury instruction on a necessarily included lesser offense when the defendant requests it. See Hagood v. State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WimberlySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Reddick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Sorrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Hagood v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API