Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, defendant, who was "mildly retarded,” contends that, although before trial he was found fit to proceed by two examiners pursuant to a CPL 730.30 order of examination, the court, sua sponte, should have ordered, during trial or sentencing, a hearing or a further psychiatric examination on the issue of his competency to proceed. He contends that the court’s failure to act deprived him of due process. Although this issue is unpreserved, it may be raised for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. SavonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. JabbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PittmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. WinebrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. WinebrennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. WINEBRENNER, CYRIL, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API