Legal Opinion

Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1928No. 18724PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “In Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Reeves, 123 Ga. 697 (51 S. E. 610), and S. A. L. Ry. v. Bishop, 132 Ga. 71 (63 S. E. 1103), it is clearly ruled that a person injured in alighting from a moving train, or even from a stationary train, by the running of the company’s locomotive, cars, or machinery is entitled to the statutory presumption.” Southern Railway Co. v. Parham, 10 Ga. App. 531 (5), 539 (73 S. E. 763). It follows that in the present case, which was a suit to recover damages for an injury to a passenger in alighting from a street-car, the court did not err in giving in charge to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. BishopSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Murphy v. Georgia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Locke v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API