People Ex Rel. Thisby v. Reclamation District No. 556
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Quo warranto. The complaint alleges that defendant is illegally claiming to he and acting as a reclamation district, and that the organization of defendant was unlawful, and that it never became a reclamation district. A general demurrer was overruled and defendant answered, alleging ,the regular formation of defendant as a reclamation district on the eighth day of September, 1893, under the provisions of the Political Code.
Defendant had judgment that it "was a public corporation, to wit, a reclamation district, legally organized and existing under the laws of the state of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Oroville & Va. R.R. v. Supervisors of Plumas Cty.California Supreme Court · 1869
- People ex rel. Van Loben Sels v. Reclamation District No. 551California Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. La RueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- In re Grove StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.