Caughlan v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local No. 37-C
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This action was commenced by respondent, an attorney at law, to recover certain fees for legal services. Has amended complaint alleged two causes of action: (1) for the balance due for services rendered appellant in connection with extensive litigation in which respondent represented Ernesto A. Mangaoang, appellant’s then business agent; and (2) for the balance due for services rendered appellant on its own behalf.
The case was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of respondent’s evidence, appellant challenged the sufficiency thereof to establish an issue of fact upon which the jury could pass.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Losli v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Western Oil Refining Co. v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- McKevitt v. Golden Age Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Troyer v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Campbell v. Hollywood Race Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leslie v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Nienaber v. Overlake Hospital Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024