Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided June 28, 1940No. Docket No. 99113Published

An individual who had been an administrator and had paid the other debts of the estate without satisfying the estate's debt for income tax due to the United Statesheld, despite his discharge by the probate court, liable in his own person and estate to the extent of such unpaid tax, under Revised Statutes, section 3467, and Revenue Act of 1934, section 311(a)(2).

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN H. BEASLEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Beasley v. Commissioner

Docket No. 99113.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

42 B.T.A. 275; 1940 BTA LEXIS 1020;

June 28, 1940, Promulgated

An individual who had been an administrator and had paid the other debts of the estate without satisfying the estate's debt for income tax due to the United Statesheld, despite his discharge by the probate court, liable in his own person and estate to the extent of such unpaid tax, under Revised Statutes, section 3467, and Revenue Act of 1934, section 311(a)(2).

John H. Beasley, Esq.,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hulburd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Haag v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  4. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Weigel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API