Legal Opinion
Farrell v. Concept Builders, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 9, 2009No. 106,047. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge.
1 1 Defendant/Appellant Concept Builders, Inc. (Builder) appeals from the trial court's Order Denying Arbitration of Plaintiffs/Ap-pellees Matthew Young Farrell and Michelle Lynn Farrell's claims for breach of a home construction contract, warranty, and negligent construction. On de novo review of the record, we find the parties did not agree to arbitrate the claims asserted. We therefore affirm the denial of Builder's motion.
T2 In their Petition, filed December 28, 2007, the Farrells asserted they entered a Contract with Builder October 26, 2004, in which Builder…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Oklahoma Oncology & Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Oxley v. General Atlantic Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City College, Inc. v. Moore Sorrento, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Highland Crossing, Lp v. Ken Laster Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010