Legal Opinion

State v. Wideman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1997No. Nos. WD 50830, WD 52755PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWIN H. SMITH, Judge.

Appellant, Floyd E. Wideman, was convicted in a judge-tried case of two counts of sodomy,1 § 566.060 RSMo *19Supp.1993.2 He was sentenced to two consecutive fifteen-year terms of imprisonment. He appeals his convictions and sentences and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. His appeals have been consolidated pursuant to Rule 29.15(Z).

In his direct appeal, appellant alleges in Point I that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal, because in Count II, the State did not charge or establish conduct constituting the crime of sodomy under § 566.060 RSMo…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. HookerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. In the Interest of Kierst v. D.D.H.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. SandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API