Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Dady

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1964No. 5-3304PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

This appeal involves a bailment. The essential facts are practically undisputed. Appellant Christensen made a purchase at the drug store of appellee Dady at about 5:00 P.M., and the amount paid for the articles purchased was $1.64. In the course of the transaction, Christensen laid his billfold on the counter and forgot to repossess it. After Christensen’s departure the clerk who had waited on him found the bill fold and delivered it to Dady, who placed it in the drawer of a filing cabinet. The next morning Christensen called Dady and learned that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bertig v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. White v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Jones v. SeymourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  4. Warren v. GeaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Hearst Corporation v. Cuneo Press, Inc., and Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roy v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. McFall Chevrolet Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Clark v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API