Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Mooney

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided May 15, 1872Published

1Opinion of the CourtHasans, J.

Lee & Leavitt, on tbe 21st of February, 1867, sued out an attachment in this court, against Thomas C. Butler, for about $47,000, and the plaintiffs became sureties in the undertaking, given by Lee & Leavitt to Butler, to procure the attachment. This undertaking was in double the amount of. the claim, and to the effect that Lee & Leavitt should pay to Butler all damages which he might sustain by reason of the attachment, if the order was wrongfully obtained. 2 S. & C. 1004. On this attachment Butler’s property was seized, and his business interrupted and stopped. On the 21st of September,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pott v. NathansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  2. Pettit v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Ball v. GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Bennett v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Bliss v. HosmerOhio Supreme Court · 1846

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API