Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 13, 1995No. CR-93-1468PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

MONTIEL, Judge.

The appellant, Andrew Burt Clark, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside his guilty plea. Clark had pleaded guilty to a charge of burglary in the third degree in violation of § 13A-7-7, Code of Alabama 1975. We remanded this cause to the circuit court to determine whether Clark’s guilty plea was the result of a negotiated plea agreement, and if so, to determine the terms of that agreement. Clark v. State, 655 So.2d 49 (Ala.Crim.App.1994).

On remand, the trial court held a hearing on this issue. The record from that hearing shows that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte OtingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Ex Parte ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API