Legal Opinion
Scott v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 8, 1929No. A-6140PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted in the district court of Le Flore county, of arson in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at two years in the state penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled, and defendant duly excepted and has appealed to this court.
The state to sustain the allegations called J. T. Pope, who testified that on the 1st day of July, 1922, he lived' on the southeast quarter of section 9, township 4, range 26 east; that he had a dwelling house built especially for a dwelling; he had a two-room house with a porch…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Jeffries v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- Houser v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963
- Sweet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Kizer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Saied v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.