Legal Opinion
United States v. Certain Real Property in Waterboro
District Court, D. Maine
Decided February 6, 1991No. Civ. 90-0224 PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GENE CARTER, Chief Judge.
ORDER GRANTING CLAIMANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
In this action the United States seeks forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) of four parcels of land, with all appurtenances and improvements thereon, and three vehicles. On December 26, 1990, Claimant Patrick Cunan filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in rem. The Government did not file an objection to the motion, but on January 15, 1991, filed a “Memorandum in Opposition to Claimant Patrick Cunan’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint.”
Local Rule 19(c), entitled Objections to Motions,” provides:
Unless…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nalty v. Nalty Tree FarmDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987
- National Savings Bank v. Jefferson BankDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
- Tushner v. United States District Court For The Central District Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Coles Express v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1988
- Andrew Corp. v. Gabriel Electronics, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vaquillas Ranch Co. v. Texaco Exploration & ProductionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
- Joseph Latham v. Dominick's Finer FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Cardente v. Fleet Bank of Maine, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1993
- Fox v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999