Harlan v. Richmond
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Howard District Court. — Hon. L. E. Eellows, Judge. Action to abate a nuisance caused by the sale of intoxicating liquor. ’ Erom a decree in defendant’s favor, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Waterman, JV
*1631 *162— It appears from the record that the defendant is a registered pharmacist, and that at the time of the acts complained of he held a permit for the 'sale of intoxicating liquor, duly issued under chapter 35, Acts Twenty-third General Assembly. The complaint is that li(? violated the terms of section 10 of that act, by selling liquor to persons' Avho were in the habit of using it as a beverage. As the requirements of this section are in dispute, we may properly, at the outset, give our construction of its language. The section is as follows: “Before selling or delivering any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Glenn v. GleasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Strayer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- State v. HoaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Russell v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Peak v. BidingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907