Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Chrisman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Warren Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit upon notes and the mortgage by which they were secured. . The cause was thrice tried below, with an improvement in point of accuracy at each succeeding trial, till the last, which reached perfection.

B. A. Ohandler, for appellant. J. H. Brown, and J. Parity for appellee.

The notes were ante-dated, and this raised a point of some trouble, in the minds of a part of the counsel, as to whether that fact did not render the notes usurious.

The payee of the notes and mortgage had, while still holding them, given a due bill for a small amount to the payer, and this raised a troublesome question…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. HathawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Rielay v. WhitcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Taylor v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API