Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 29, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming-

The appellant was tried and convicted under an indictment charging him with the offense of conspiring, confederating and banding together with certain other named accomplices for the purpose of breaking and entering a storehouse with the intention of stealing therefrom. On this appeal he insists that his demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained; that the corroboration of the accomplice who testified against him was not sufficient to support the conviction; that he was entitled to a continuance asked for; and that the instructions…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Brent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Holcomb v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eubank v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  2. Federal Chemical Co. v. PaddockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Acree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Riggsby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API