Legal Opinion

Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 8, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00246Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON GARY A., Plaintiff, Case No. 3:20-cv-246 vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Michael J. Newman Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (DOC. NO. 23); (2) AWARDING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL $16,491.02 IN ATTORNEY’S FEES; (3) ORDERING PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO REFUND $4,423 IN EAJA FEES TO PLAINTIFF; AND (4) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT’S…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Joseph J. ROYZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Spiller v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API