Legal Opinion

San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. County of Stanislaus

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1914No. 303PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve the validity under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of orders establishing water rates of an irrigation company in California, are stated .in the opinion.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The facts, which involve the validity under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of orders establishing water rates of an irrigation company in California, are stated .in the opinion. Complainant is hot entitled to have its alleged water rights valued as increasing the value of its tangible properties; nor is complainant entitled to have its alleged water rights valued as part of its “going, concern.” Complainant introduced no evidence of the value of “going concern” or of “good-will.”…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a bill to restrain 'the enforcement of orders passed by the Boards of Supervisors of the three defendant Counties, Stanislaus, Fresno and Merced, establishing water rates to be charged by the plaintiff, the appellant; the ground of the bill being that the orders deprive the plaintiff of its propérty without due process of law. By a statute of March 12, 1885, the Boards are authorized to fix these rates for their several Counties, but so that the returns to the parties furnishing the water shall be not less than six per cent, upon the value of the 'canals, ditches, flumes, chutes, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Graham v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Lowell Gas Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API