Ramsey v. Ramsey
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentMcQUADE, Chief Justice
I am unable to agree with the majority’s position that Lloyd Ramsey’s military retirement pay should be treated as a community asset. This issue is one of first impression before this Court. I am aware that other community property states have wrestled with this issue and reached a contrary conclusion.1 Although case law from our sister states is persuasive, it is by no means binding upon this Court.
This dissent is founded on the premise that the area of military retirement pay has been preempted by federal law, and under the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution,2 state law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Free v. BlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bessie Thompson v. Edward Thompson, a Minor, by Helen Mae ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Charles R. And Irene WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.