Pearce v. Boberg
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Gunderson, J.:
This appeal seeks reversal of a judgment for personal injuries caused to respondent by her husband’s negligence before marriage. The primary appellate contention is that the trial court erred in allowing respondent to prosecute her action, because a wife may not sue her husband in tort. We disagree., In an automobile owned by appellant Stephen Dale Pearce’s father, appellant Frederick Pearce, Stephen and respondent Debra Kay Boberg left California together, enroute to Idaho where they planned to be married. In Nevada, Stephen negligently caused the automobile…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Freehe v. FreeheWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Brooks v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Beaudette v. FranaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Hosko v. HoskoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Childress v. ChildressTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
- Chen v. LiaoDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976