Legal Opinion

Wendell A. Martin and Vanessa Faciane v. Marco Demma

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1987No. 86-3844PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the statute of limitations bars a suit where the district court clerk receives the complaint within the applicable limitations period but does not formally file it until two weeks later. Because the date of receipt by the clerk, rather than the date of formal filing, governs the commencement of an action, we vacate the judgment dismissing the complaint.

I

Wendell A. Martin (“Martin”), a state prisoner, and Vanessa Faciane (“Faciane”), his fiancee, instituted an action pro se, alleging violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, as amended, 42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Carlyle W. Hatchell v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Raymundo R. Mendoza v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Gonzales v. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. James R. Wilson v. Linda A. Giesen, County of LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald UrrutiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. McIntosh v. AntoninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API