Bautista v. Star Cruises
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE, LTD.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
SEITZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd.’s (“NCL”) Motion to Compel Arbitration [DE-10], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand [DE-13] and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees [DE-19]. 1 Plaintiffs filed their three-count complaints alleging negligence and unseaworthiness under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and failure to provide maintenance, cure and unearned wages under the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rizalyn Bautista v. Star CruisesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Krstic v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.(CORP.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- In Re Eternity Shipping, Ltd., Eurocarriers, SaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Acosta v. Norwegian Cruise Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Bautista v. Star CruisesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.