Legal Opinion

Uhle v. Burnham

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

Were tbis a motion for the ordinary security for costs, I should be inclined to deny it, on the ground of jielay; .but it is really an application for security as to extraordinary disbursements, which were not within the contemplation of either party until quite recently. The granting of such a motion at this stage of the case is within the discretion of the court. Hugunin v. Thatcher, 18 Fed. Rep. 105; Stewart v. The Sun, 36 Fed. Rep. 307. Inasmuch as the application, was made with reasonable diligence after the entry of the order of reference, the plaintiff should…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cavicchi v. Mohawk Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. Cornacchio v. ConiglioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  3. Deprez v. Thomson-Houston Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1894
  4. Minneapolis Gasoline & Fuel Co. v. Ethyl Gasoline Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  5. Peltz v. Carolina Bagging Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API